Comment Log Display

Here is the comment you selected to display.

Comment 6 for AQIP Funding Plan for FY 2012-13 (aqip2012) - Non-Reg.

First NameAndreas
Last NameKlugescheid
Email Addressandreas.klugescheid@bmwna.com
AffiliationBMW Group
SubjectBMW Group Comments on the Proposed AB 118 Air Quality
Comment
BMW Group supports the proposed AB 118 Air Quality Improvement
Program (AQIP) Funding Plan for Fiscal Year 2012-13. The plan will
give further impulses in order to develop the market for plug-in
electric vehicles in California. With that, AQIP remains one of the
key instruments to achieve the challenging goals set by the revised
ZEV regulation and the ambitious targets laid down in Governor
Brown’s Executive Order B-16-2012 with a benchmark of 1.5 million
zero emission vehicles in California by 2025.

BMW Group namely supports the availability of the full amount of
incentive for so-called BEVx vehicles. BMW Group strongly believes
that this category will serve as an effective accelerator for the
deployment of ZEVs in the market. With the introduction of this
category in the AQIP program, consistency with the ZEV regulation
is established.    

We would also like to point out two matters of concern:

a.	The funding plan clearly indicates that for fiscal year 2012 –
2013, there is a high probability that the funding provided for
plug-in vehicles in the passenger car category will not be
sufficient to cover demand. Staff has responded to this issue with
a “first come/first serve” arrangement. 
This approach will most probably lead to a situation where funding
will be available for customer A buying a plug-in vehicle in the
early part of the fiscal year but not for customer B purchasing the
very same vehicle in the later part of the fiscal year. 

Another element of potential controversy could be a scenario where
an OEM is launching a new electric vehicle only in the later part
of the fiscal year, thus running the risk that ALL customers of
this new vehicle will not be able to obtain funding through AQIP.
 
BMW Group is aware of the funding limitation and the need for
laying out a compromise scheme for funding distribution. However,
from a market perspective the current proposal does bear risks like
the above mentioned. We will relay on ARB to communicate the
experiences made for fiscal year 2012 – 2013. These lessons learned
may serve as valuable input for the following fiscal year 2013 –
2014.
 
b.	 As AB 118 and the related AQIP program is coming to a close in
2015, the lack of incentives will become even more apparent in a
market that is still emerging even in three years time. 

This and the challenges of underfunding as early as 2013 pose the
question of potential sources for an enhanced and prolonged AQIP
program. BMW Group strongly suggests to consider revenues from the
upcoming cap-and-trade auctions to be invested in the AQIP program.
By reducing CO2 emissions from transportation, such a transfer of
revenues would clearly serve the policy goals laid down in AB 32.
As a result, California would see the multiplication of the effects
of the cap-and-trade program by not only reducing emissions in the
production sector but also incentivizing the reduction of CO2
emissions originating from the mobility sector. 


BMW Group would appreciate if the Board could consider these two
concerns. We would also like to take the opportunity to thank ARB
for their continued support of the market launch of electric
vehicles. 

Attachment www.arb.ca.gov/lists/aqip2012/7-bmwgroupab118fundingplan20122013.pdf
Original File NameBMWGroupAB118FundingPlan20122013.pdf
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted 2012-06-27 08:42:30

If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.


Board Comments Home