Comment Log Display

I thought that Carbon Allowances should be like voting.  We have
one person one vote.  Why not one person one carbon allowance? 
What about the guy who I saw on the way home today who had parked a
shopping cart he'd been pushing and was taking a rest under some
blankets.  This guy was certainly producing even less CO2 that I
was on my bicycle.  I'm not joking.  Should he not somehow be able
to benefit from selling his carbon allowances to, say, Chevron, or
someone who uses alot of motorized transportation?  (I'd prefer the
former, because it will be much less administrative overhead to tax
carbon as it comes out of the ground or into California.)