First Name | Heather |
---|---|
Last Name | Clapp |
Email Address | clappheather@gmail.com |
Affiliation | Piedmont Connect |
Subject | Alternatives to Cap and Trade in AB 32 |
Comment | Dear Board Members, I urge you to eliminate the Cap and Trade approach when taking a closer look at the way the AB 32 Bill is structured. A stronger plan would include the following approaches: 1) Implement a Carbon Tax. This is a much more transparent approach to pricing carbon. Also, the revenues go to the state, which can use it to close the budget gap, re-fund our public transportation systems, schools, and social services, and invest in green energy. We, the People, need that money more than Chevron does — make polluters pay! 2) Regulate Specific Pollution Sources. A carbon tax makes it more expensive to pollute, but does not always guarantee less pollution. It is critical to combine this policy with strict enforcement of clean air laws with the biggest polluters, such as oil refineries, making sure to clean up the environment for the communities that live around them. Thank you for taking the time to consider these two thoughtful, economical viable approaches for the State of California. Please help us take the lead and model this so others can quickly catch on. Time is of the essence and we can not led by Big Oil Companies and the American Chemical Council any longer. The future of our children is what counts. Best, Heather Clapp Piedmont, CA. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2011-07-26 11:43:10 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.