Comment Log Display

Here is the comment you selected to display.

Comment for Supplement to FED -AB-32 Scoping with CEQA (ceqa-sp11) - Non-Reg.

First NameRose Penelope
Last NameYee
Email Addressrose@greenretirementplans.com
AffiliationGreen Retirement Plans, Inc.
SubjectNo to a Cap-and-Trade Program for California
Comment
Please do not consider a carbon cap-and-trade program for
California.

Please consider these two options instead:

Carbon Tax - This is a much more transparent approach to pricing
carbon. Also, the revenues go to the state, which can use it to
close the budget gap, re-fund our public transportation systems,
schools, and social services, and invest in green energy. We the
People need that money more than Chevron does – make polluters
pay!
    
Regulate specific pollution sources - A carbon tax makes it more
expensive to pollute, but does not always guarantee less pollution.
That’s why it’s a good idea to combine this policy with strict
enforcement of clean air laws with the biggest polluters, such as
oil refineries, making sure to clean up the environment for the
communities that live around them.

Thank you for your efforts in helping California reduce its carbon
emissions in the most effective and sustainable manner possible.

Attachment
Original File Name
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted 2011-07-28 11:53:29

If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.


Board Comments Home