First Name | Richard |
---|---|
Last Name | Pearl |
Email Address | pearl@floridachemical.com |
Affiliation | Florida Chemical Company |
Subject | Unreasonable 10% VOC Standards for Automotive Maintenance Products |
Comment | October 19, 2006 David Mallory, P.E. Manager, Measures Development Section, Stationary Source Division California Air Resources Board P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95812 Re: Unreasonable 10% VOC Standards for Automotive Maintenance Products Dear Mr. Mallory: The Florida Chemical Company and its 45 employees are very concerned about the Air Resources Board’s (ARB’s) 10 % VOC emission standards for the four automotive maintenance product categories in the proposed 2006 Amendments to California’s Consumer Products Regulation. The proposed 10% VOC standard for Brake Cleaners, Carburetor or Fuel-Injection Air Intake Cleaners, Engine Degreasers, and General Purpose Degreasers will destroy the ability to manufacture automotive maintenance products that are used to effectively clean and maintain vehicles. Florida Chemical Company manufactures and markets a variety of citrus by-products that are useful to companies manufacturing products in these categories for sale in California. The impact of these standards would negatively impact automotive maintenance personnel, classic automobile enthusiasts, and anyone who owns or operates a motor vehicle in California. Proper vehicle maintenance is essential to maintaining the safety of automobiles and the proper wear of automotive parts like brakes, carburetors, engines, and others. Specifically, Florida Chemical is concerned that the ARB has not considered the potential hazards that may be caused by residues on automotive brake parts or other vital automotive parts. We are also concerned that the proposed standards will increase costs to the automotive service industry and to consumers due to the additional time required for brake jobs and other degreasing operations from additional drying time and less effective products. Florida Chemical is also concerned that the ARB has not considered benefits of effective engine maintenance in reducing automotive VOC, nitrogen oxide, and particulate matter air emissions. In addition, the ARB has not considered the inability to use low-vapor pressure (LVP) ingredients to reformulate these products and the negative impacts of oily residues in air intake systems that can collect soils from the air. The ARB has also failed to consider current limitations to carburetor or fuel-injection air intake cleaner formulations due to the U.S. EPA’s required registration of fuel additives. Finally, Florida Chemical is seriously concerned that these 10% VOC standards will result in the essential elimination of these product categories and the use of non-regulated solvents, like gasoline, in these applications. Our industry has already reduced emissions from these products and has offered to make additional reductions. However the current proposed 10% VOC standards are not a reasonable compromise, nor are the proposed limits technologically and commercially feasible. Therefore we strongly suggest that the ARB withdraw the 10% VOC standards and propose a more reasonable regulatory limit that will protect California’s air quality without having such a severe negative impact on these vitally important automotive maintenance products. Sincerely, Richard Pearl Regulatory Affairs cc: Andrew Hackman, ASPA D. Douglas Fratz, CSPA Joseph Yost, CSPA |
Attachment | www.arb.ca.gov/lists/cpwg2006/35-fcc_letter_to_carb_concerning_proposed_auto_voc_limits.doc |
Original File Name | FCC Letter to CARB Concerning Proposed Auto VOC Limits.doc |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2006-10-24 06:46:23 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.