| Comment | Dear Chairman Nichols:
While the ARB is considering alternatives to the cap-and-trade
program, please also correct the major flaws in your agency's
forestry protocol.
As it stands now with the current cap-and-trade forestry protocol,
California will be rewarding timber companies for despoiling the
land and emitting large volumes of CO2.
The protocol allows forest clearcuts (a.k.a even-aged management)
that can dramatically impair water quality and quantity in affected
watersheds. The clearcuts you permit to qualify as "offsets"
potentially impact the health and well-being of millions of
Californians, as well as future generations.
Please correct the forestry protocol to allow "offset" projects to
include only uneven-age forests — which not only sequester CO2 but
preserve wildlife habitat and other values.
Sincerely,
Paul Stoft ScD
|
|---|