Comment Log Display

Here is the comment you selected to display.

Comment for Proposed Low Carbon Fuel Standard Amendments (lcfs2024) - .

First NameRosemary
Last NameGraham-Gardner
Email Addressliaisonsus@aol.com
Affiliation
SubjectPlease reform the Low Carbon Fuel Standard
Comment
Dear California Air Resources Board,

Your proposed amendments to California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard
are a climate policy failure that backslides on the state's role as
a climate leader. The program subsidizes combustion fuels to the
tune of billions of dollars per year and has no place in our
toolkit of climate policies for the 2020s. There is too much on the
line for our climate to get this critical program so wrong. 

Governor Newsom's budget proposes significant delays and cuts of
hundreds of millions of dollars to vital zero-emission
transportation programs, which makes it all the more urgent to use
the Low Carbon Fuel Standard to more fully support zero-emissions
transportation. Historically, California has thrown good money
after bad, and devoted 80% of the LCFS's $3 to 4 billion each and
every year to combustion technology. It would be wild to allow
these funds to continue to languish on the climate sidelines,
instead of anchoring our transition to a zero-emissions future. 

The world has changed a lot since the implementation of the LCFS in
2009. Unlike the 2000s, we have a north star goal for our climate
and the air we breathe: zero emissions transportation.  Continuing
to invest the billions in revenue from the LCFS into harmful and
polluting biofuels that end up combusted, instead of electric
vehicles powered by clean energy, hampers our efforts to fight the
climate crisis while enriching oil companies and industrial
agriculture. 

I strongly urge you to correct your course and modernise the
program by reflecting your consensus that the only way to meet air
quality standards is through eliminating combustion altogether, not
piling on billions of dollars in lavish incentives for combustion
each and every year. By focusing on real air pollution solutions,
you could add a clean air multiplier to the credits system,
especially for public fleets that transport many people at once,
would deliver major benefits for California's air quality and throw
a lifeline to cash-strapped transit agencies that low-income
Californians depend on for mobility. 

California cannot meet our clean air and climate goals without
harnessing the power of the Low Carbon Fuel Standard and
overhauling this multibillion-dollar program for our zero emissions
future. I strongly urge you to act expeditiously to reform the
program to achieve our state's ambitious goals.

Sincerely,
Rosemary Graham-Gardner
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266

Attachment
Original File Name
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted 2024-02-04 23:59:56

If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.


Board Comments Home