First Name | Lance |
---|---|
Last Name | Wallace |
Email Address | lwallace73@comcast.net |
Affiliation | USEPA (retired) |
Subject | In-duct air cleaners |
Comment | I support the proposed regulation but it appears ambiguous to me in its coverage. Specifically, does it apply to in-duct air cleaners? (These are air cleaners, either electronic or mechanical, generally costing $1000 or so, that are installed in the ductwork of forced-air HVAC systems in private homes.) If so, then the proposed test method is not suitable for such air cleaners, and needs to be modified to test these air cleaners under the conditions they will be used. The reason for this is that ozone created by an in-duct air cleaner may be largely removed by reaction with particles in the duct, particles collected on the duct lining, or the duct material itself before emerging into the conditioned space. This is an important consideration for a class of air cleaners known as electrostatic precipitators (ESPs). These air cleaners use an electric potential to force particles to settle out on a series of metal vanes. Some ozone is created by this method, but as stated above, it is possible that the ozone concentration will be reduced during passage through the ductwork to minimal levels by the time the filtered air emerges into the breathing space. I have tested both in-duct ESPs and in-duct high-quality mechanical filters under normal living conditions in a home over more than one year. (Wallace, L.A. and Howard-Reed, C.H. Continuous Monitoring of Ultrafine, Fine, and Coarse Particles in a Residence for 18 Months in 1999-2000. J Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 52(7):828-844. 2002.) The efficiency of the two air cleaners was determined for 6 particle size categories (0.3-0.5 microns, 0.5-1, 1-2.5, 2.5-5, 5-10, 10-20 microns). The ESP was able to remove all sizes with better than 90% efficiency (when properly cleaned). But the mechanical filter was unable to remove the fine particles smaller than 2.5 microns. Since these fine particles are regulated by the US EPA as potentially harmful, it is important to have a method to remove them; the mechanical filter tested failed at this. In addition, although the efficiency for ultrafine particles was not tested in this study, it is likely that they too can be effectively removed by ESPs as well as HEPA filters. Ultrafines have not been fully characterized with respect to health effects, but it is possible that they will be found to be harmful at some concentrations. Since in-duct ESPs may have an important health advantage for users, it is important to test them under the conditions of use (that is, installed in a duct). Therefore, if in-duct air cleaners are in fact covered under this regulation, then the test method should be augmented by a method employing ductwork in the test room to emulate the conditions under which they will be used. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2007-09-22 07:49:43 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.