First Name | robert |
---|---|
Last Name | dorazio |
Email Address | marym911@aol.com |
Affiliation | business owner off road |
Subject | comments on off road rule |
Comment | The proposed revision is insufficient to address the horrid economic condition. a. One suggestion is to integrate the various rule making categories - please. To comply with the truck rule and the offroad rule as separate entities does not allow the business owner to select and prioritize the most economically viable technology. b. Use of level 2 devices for 'some period of time' in lieu of administratively rejecting these devices shows no regard for existing technology which can reduce the amount 60% for far less cost and effect on the engine than the 85% regulatory mandate. This proposal would be in keeping with the theme of the proposed revision. This technology was in fact allowed for solid waste haulers but is not allowed for any other category. This technology would allow older machines to have some value which could be used to climb the ladder to the newer technology. * The consideration of any of these items is kindly appreciated to encourage the future use of the new technology mandated for new equipment. Sincerely, Robert Dorazio |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2010-03-18 16:32:46 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.