First Name | R |
---|---|
Last Name | Goodwin |
Email Address | bjcgoodwn@aol.com |
Affiliation | Owner/Operator |
Subject | Economic Hardship Status |
Comment | I am the owner of 1987 Peterbilt Dump Truck and will effectively be out of business come January 1, 2015. I do not qualify for any upgrades, retrofits or extensions. My family, as have many others, are just coming out of the worst four economic years of our generation. I have used all our life savings and taken out a second mortgage on our 980 sq foot home just to get by and struggle to stay in business that we felt would eventually recover. My wife and I did what we had to in order to responsibly take care of our family and keep a roof over our heads while taking any and all work that was available and then wait and wait in order to get paid and sometimes not at all should the business we worked for go under. Now there is a proposed option of Economic Hardship in order for us to extend the life of a perfectly good truck. We would probably qualify for a loan, our credit is good because we were responsible and paid our bills. What would not be responsible is taking on the loan for a new truck, and used compliant trucks just don't exist. There isn't enough work to justify the payment and the down time that many of these new trucks are experiencing. Everyone would love to drive a new truck. That combined with the fact that our dealerships have long sold their allotments of new trucks for the year, with a waiting list well into 2015 now for a newer truck. Should we somehow qualify for EH distinction, then we would proudly display that sticker for all to see on the side of our truck? That isn't right. We don't do that to people anymore. People aren't required to wear signs around their neck that says poor. In what other areas of government is this kind of treatment tolerated? Check yourselves. Here's a solution that could help a great deal. Most of us have benefitted from government jobs and that has been what started the economic recovery process. How about requiring or giving a break to hiring local companies? I see city, county, state jobs all over our area using trucks from far away, that drive 60-100 miles in the morning before they ever start their day and then return back to their terminals at night. Local contracts would reduce total mileage thus reduce pollution. We have had to drive long distances as well because local jobs went to out of towners. Thus our total mileage is far higher than it should be and disqualifying us for WT distinction. In conclusion, we're not poor, we're just not poor enough. Come January 1, 2015, we will be. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2014-07-15 10:44:52 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.