Comment Log Display
Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 132 for 2013 Investment Plan for Cap-and-Trade Auction Proceeds (2013investmentpln-ws) - 1st Workshop.
First Name: Charles
Last Name: Harris
Email Address: mondizzi@gmail.com
Affiliation: Marin County Bicycle Coalition (Member)
Subject: CAP AND TRADE FUNDING FOR BIKE/PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE
Comment:
I am writing to request that funds from the California Cap and Trade Program be used to make major investments in the State's virtually nonexistent and woefully inadequate bicyle and pedestrian infrastructure. The fastest route to improving air quality in California is to reduce consumption of oil. The fastest and most dramatic way to reduce consumption of oil is to get people out of their cars and onto their feet and their bicycles. The fastest way to get people onto their feet and their bicycles is to provide convenient and SAFE pedestrian and cycle routes. Probably no one would doubt that riding a bicycle or walking uses less oil than a motor vehicle, but the magnitude of the savings can be startling. Tom Murphy, an associate professor of physics at the University of California, San Diego, has calculated that a human on a bicycle gets as many as 1,300 mpg-equivalent, while a human walking achieves as many as 340 mpg-equivalent. so why are there so few cyclists and pedestrians using bicyles and boots to do their business? The simple, straightforward and accurate answer is that the State's infrastructure for cycling and walking is, in a word, abominable. One often hears politicians say that they can't afford to invest in the infrastructure because there aren't enough cyclists and pedestrians to justify the investments, that they can't build facilities that will stand empty when the motor vehicle roads are gridlocked. But how many pedestrians and cyclists are prepared to risk a tussle with a harried motorist in a 5,000-lb. SUV - a tussle in which only one is likely to emerge unscathed? I ride my bicycle most everywhere I go, and I can say with some authority that, even living in "environmentally and socially-progressive" Marin County, riding a bicycle on the streets is unsafe. In fact, I am re-evaluating my use of a bicycle since being smacked two weeks ago by a Prius making a left turn from 4th Street in San Rafael. Fortunately, I suffered only minor damage, though my bicycle did not fare so well. Since that incident, I have been plagued by images of what my body might have looked like if, instead of a Prius, the battering ram had been a Toyota Land Cruiser or a Cadillac Escalade. People don't ride on the roads, and pedestrians don't walk on the roads, because they are scared. It's just that simple - really. Especially in California, with its mild winters and predictable precipitation, if you build a safe infrastructure, people will use it. So what kind of infrastructure is needed? Well, it's more than painting cute little pictures of bikes and writing nifty slogans like "Share the Road" on the pavement. First of all, motorists don't even notice those. Second, they don't make the road any wider, or eliminate a single parked car (you can only appreciate the danger of a parked car once you've been "car-doored" by a motorist who swings the driver-side door open right in front of you). The infrastructure that's needed comprises bicycle and pedestrian routes that are segregated from the motor vehicle traffic. There are many ways to achieve this, and organizations like the Marin County Bicycle Coalition can provide many examples of methods that have proven effective. Much can also be learned from countries such as The Netherlands and Denmark, which are light-years beyond us in providing safe bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. Also of utmost important is approaching the matter of infrastructure with the right attitude. "Transportation" has to mean, in the minds of the planners and engineers, more than "motor vehicle transportation". Cyclists and pedestrians must be given equal attention and consideration in making infrastructure investment decisions; in fact, I would argue that they must be given paramount consideration, given their physical vulnerability (no airbags on a bike, and the crush zone is your body!) and their past status as secondary - or non-existent - citizens. Finally, an integral part of investing in cycling and pedestrian infrastructure is changing the perceptions and attitudes of motorists from of annoyance at the presence of cyclists and pedestrians to one of respect and appreciation of their extreme physical vulnerability and the contribution they make to improving the quality of our air and reducing our reliance on imported fossil fuels. Of equal importance is educating bicyclists and pedestrians on the responsibility they have to obey traffic rules and to respect the rights and vulnerabilities of drivers. The only thing I can imagine that would be as bad as being hit by a car is being the driver who hits a cyclist or pedestrian. In short, we are all in this transportation mess together, and we need to do our parts by obeying the rules and being considerate of each other. Thank you for your time and attention.
Attachment:
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2013-03-07 19:58:09
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.