Comment Log Display
Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 150 for 2013 Investment Plan for Cap-and-Trade Auction Proceeds (2013investmentpln-ws) - 1st Workshop.
First Name: Judy
Last Name: Curry
Email Address: fargojay@aol.com
Affiliation: Women For: Orange County
Subject: Support for the Green Vision Project
Comment:
March 7, 2013 California Air Resources Board P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95812 RE: Comments on the ARB Draft Investment Plan Dear Air Resources Board: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Air Resources Board Cap and Trade Auction Proceeds Investment Plan Draft Concept Paper (Draft Investment Plan). Women For: Orange County is based in Orange County, California and our mission is Working for a Better World - a grassroots advocacy organization founded in 1984. Our organization includes support from over 200 residents in the county. We are writing to provide substantive comments on the Draft Investment Plan as it relates to natural resources and conservation. We support better alignment with AB 1532’s mandates as it relates to natural resources and conservation strategies as a mechanism to reduce emissions. The Draft Investment Plan mentions natural resources and conservation but does not utilize or identify appropriate tools that reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) through conservation and restoration of habitat lands. AB 1532 states that auction revenues shall be used to facilitate the achievement of reductions of GHG emissions in California. These funds shall be spent in a manner that maximizes economic, environmental, and public health benefits. The Act specifically states the GHG Reduction Fund shall appropriate funds towards one of several items, including the reduction of GHG emissions associated with water use and supply, land and natural resources conservation and management, forestry, and sustainable agriculture. Yet, not a single conservation strategy is outlined in the Investment Plan that furthers this mandate. Please revise the Draft Investment Plan to include land conservation tools as a strategy for emissions reductions. Existing funding sources could be leveraged to increase conservation dollars and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. There are numerous types of conservation funding from local government general funds, development fees, grant funds allocated from the federal Endangered Species Act, funding from California’s General Obligation (GO) bond measures and many other sources. To continue to implement a regional conservation plan, ongoing funding sources is needed to meet conservation objectives and to complete the conservation vision. Any cap and trade revenues available for regional conservation plans would be a much needed boost to the conservation effort while concurrently meeting emission reduction targets. Thank you for your time and the opportunity to provide feedback to the Air Resources Board on the Draft Investment Plan. Sincerely, Judy Curry Environmental Chair Women For: Orange County cc: Cliff Rechtschaffen
Attachment:
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2013-03-08 09:51:18
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.