Comment Log Display

Here is the comment you selected to display.

Comment #48 for General comments on ARB staff's overall approach on interim GHG significance thresholds under the CEQA.
(ceqa-general-ws) - 2nd Workshop

First Name: Rhys
Last Name: Rowland
Email Address: rrowland@cityofdavis.org
AffiliationCity of Davis
SubjectGeneral Questions/Comments Regarding the Approach
Comment
o	It is good to have a threshold to compare a project to?

o	How will we know if a study provides a valid number?

o	What resources can we rely upon to validate numbers related to
projects?

o	How do we evaluate projects that do not fall into these three
use categories?  Does a “commercial” project include projects which
are public/semi-public, office, churches, schools, or other?  We
think more guidance will be necessary since substantial categories
of projects would not be evaluated under the proposed thresholds. 

o	Do we merely condition a project to be in compliance with the
standards and have the applicant provide proof?
Attachment

Original File Name:

Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2009-01-14 16:40:45


If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.

Board Comments Home