First Name: | Elena |
---|---|
Last Name: | Guilfoil |
Email Address: | elena.guilfoil@ecy.wa.gov |
Affiliation | Washington State Dept. of Ecology |
Subject | Possible Table Mistakes |
Comment |
I offer suggestions for correcting possible mistakes in the table. My comments refer to references to 2012 instead of 2014. If you intended the 2012 references, then I misunderstood your intent. 1. Please take a look at the title of the table as it appears to be a combination of the 2012 and 2013 table titles. 2012--Table 1: 2012 Crude Average Carbon Intensity Calculation 2013--2013 Crude Average Carbon Intensity Calculation 2014--Table 1: 2012 Refinery Crude Supply The language in the 2014 document is similar to the other 2 LCFS Crude Oil Lifecycle Assessments so you might consider changing the title to "2014 Crude Average Carbon Intensity Calculation." 2. Under the "Crude Name" column, the first item is "2012 Volume Weighted Average CI." This analysis calculates the average CI for 2014. Should the cell say "2014 Volume Weighted Average CI"? 3. 11.35 is listed in the first cell under the "CI" column. Your document says the 2014 crude average carbon intensity is 11.30. 4. The last column heading is "2012 Volume." Should this be 2012, 2013 and 2014 Volume? This would be consistent with formatting in the other 2 assessments. 5. The first cell in the last column lists 594,494,779. I am confused why there is a number in this cell when the other 2 assessments left this cell blank. You may simply have changed your format but I didn't see an explanation for this change. |
Attachment |
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2015-05-19 12:28:43 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.