TITLE 17. CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO
THE AGRICULTURAL BURNING GUIDELINES
The Air Resources Board (the "Board" or "ARB") will conduct a public hearing at the time and place noted below to consider the adoption of regulations to amend Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations regarding Agricultural Burning Guidelines.
|DATE:||March 23, 2000|
|PLACE:||Air Resources Board
Board Hearing Room
2020 L Street
This item will be considered at a two-day meeting of the Board commencing at 9:30 a.m., March 23, 2000,and may continue at 8:30 a.m., March 24, 2000, if necessary. This item may not be considered until March 24, 2000. Please consult the agenda for this meeting, which will be available at least ten days before March 23, 2000, to determine the day on which this item will be considered.
This facility is accessible to persons with disabilities. If accommodation is needed, please contact ARB’s Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594, or TDD (916) 324-9531, or (800) 700-8326 for TDD calls for outside the Sacramento area at least 14 days before the hearing.
INFORMATIVE DIGEST OF PROPOSED ACTION AND PLAIN ENGLISH POLICY STATEMENT OVERVIEW
Proposed Actions and Sections Affected: Proposed amendments to Subchapter 2, Chapter 1, Division 3, title 17, California Code of Regulations (CCR), sections 80100, 80101, 80102, 80110, 80120, 80120, 80130, 80140, 80145, 80150, 80155, 80160, 80170, 80175, 80179, 80180, 80200, 80210, 80230, 80240, 80250, 80260, 80270, 80280, 80290, 80300, 80310, 80311, 80320, and 80330.
Background: "Agricultural burning" refers to the intentional use of fire for vegetation management in areas such as agricultural fields, orchards, and wildlands like rangeland and forests. The planned use of fire on wildlands is generally referred to as "prescribed burning", a subset of agricultural burning. The ARB currently has agricultural burning regulations, which it is proposing to amend. Upon the adoption of an amended State regulation, the local air pollution control district or air quality management district (air district) responsible under State law for managing the smoke impacts of agricultural burning would be required to adopt and implement conforming programs and requirements.
The State’s Agricultural Burning Guidelines are implemented by either the local air district or, in those air basins consisting of two or more air districts, the Basinwide Air Pollution Control Council ("basinwide council"). The ARB has program oversight authority and makes daily burn/no-burn decisions for each air basin or portion thereof.
The existing program has generally been effective in managing agricultural burning, given the current levels of prescribed burning for wildland management. However, we believe it is both necessary and timely to reevaluate the regulation to improve the statewide smoke management program for the following reasons:
Given the significant concern in California about the impact of smoke from expected increases in prescribed fire, as well as some problems with the current system to regulate and monitor burns, there is a need to strengthen California’s existing smoke management program. These proposed regulatory revisions, in combination with enhanced forecasting tools and improved communication and coordination with federal, State, and private land managers, should advance this objective.
Summary of Proposed Rule Amendments:
The proposed amendments to the Agricultural Burning Guidelines provide direction to air districts in the regulation and control of agricultural burning, including prescribed burning, in California. The regulatory actions called for are intended to assure that each air district has a program that meets specific State and federal requirements. The proposed amendments contain the following major new features relative to the existing Agricultural Burning Guidelines:
AVAILABILITY OF DOCUMENTS AND AGENCY CONTACT PERSON
The ARB has determined that it is not feasible to draft the regulations in plain English due to the technical nature of the regulations; however a non-controlling plain English summary of the regulations is contained in the Initial Statement of Reasons (ISOR), in the discussion of the proposed regulation, and is available from the contact person named in this notice. The ISOR, the full text of the proposed regulatory language, and a discussion of the potential environmental impacts of the proposal may be obtained from the Air Resources Board, Public Information Office, 2020 L Street, Sacramento, California 95814, (916) 322-2990, at least 45 days prior to the scheduled hearing. The ARB staff has compiled a record that includes all information upon which the proposal is based. Copies of the documents may be obtained through the Air Resources Board, Public Information Office, 2020 L Street, Sacramento, California 95814.
Further inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to Agency Contact Person Ms. Lucille van Ommering, Staff Air Pollution Specialist, Air Quality and Transportation Planning Branch, Planning and Technical Support Division, P.O. Box 2815, Sacramento, California 95812, (916) 323-0296.
COSTS TO PUBLIC AGENCIES AND TO BUSINESSES AND PERSONS AFFECTED
The ARB's Executive Officer has determined that the proposed regulatory action will not create direct costs or savings, as defined in Government Code section 11346.5(a)(6), to any State agency or in federal funding to the State, costs or mandate to any school district whether or not reimbursable by the State pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with section 17500), Division 4, Title 2 of the Government Code, or non-discretionary savings to local agencies. The ARB's Executive Officer has also determined that the proposed regulatory action will create costs or savings, as defined in Government Code section 11346.5(a)(6), to local agencies (air districts) whether or not reimbursable by the State pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with section 17500), Division 4, Title 2 of the Government Code. However, in this case, such administrative costs are not reimbursable because they are recoverable by fees that are within an air pollution control/air quality management district's authority to assess.
In developing this regulatory proposal, the ARB staff evaluated the potential economic impacts on private persons and businesses. The Executive Officer has determined that the proposed regulatory action will not have a significant adverse economic impact on businesses, or on directly-affected private persons. In accordance with Government Code section 11346.3, the Executive Officer has determined that the proposed regulatory action should have a positive impact on the creation or elimination of jobs within the State of California, positive impacts on the creation of new businesses or elimination of existing businesses within California, and positive impacts on the expansion of businesses currently doing business within California. The Executive Officer has also determined that the proposed action will not directly affect the ability of California businesses to compete with businesses in other states. An assessment of the economic impacts of the proposed regulatory action can be found in the Staff Report/Initial Statement of Reasons.
As explained in the Initial Statement of Reasons, it likely that some individual businesses may be adversely affected by the proposed regulatory action. Therefore, the Executive Officer finds that the adoption of the proposed amendments may have a significant adverse impact on some businesses. The Executive Officer has considered proposed alternatives that would lessen any adverse economic impact to business and invites the public to submit proposals. Submissions may include but are not limited to the following considerations:
The Board’s Executive Officer has also determined, pursuant to Government Code section 11346.5(a)(3)(B), that the regulation will affect small business.
Before taking final action on the proposed regulatory action, the Board must determine that no alternative considered by the agency would be more effective in carrying out the purpose for which the action is proposed or would be as effective and less burdensome to affected private persons than the proposed action.